Fake designer sneakersReal Shoes Wear - Glue Split in Action, Not Fake Eyes in Putian Watching.

Fake designer sneakersReal Shoes Wear - Glue Split in Action, Not Fake Eyes in Putian Watching.， 

真鞋与莆田鞋的鉴别：开胶与品质的探讨

In the realm of footwear, the difference between genuine shoes and those manufactured in areas like Putian, China often becomes a subject of scrutiny for consumers. A common misconception among many is that "real shoes" are prone to "opening glue" or de-lamination, while shoes from Putian are not subject to such scrutiny. This article aims to delve into this subject and offer a balanced perspective on the matter.

Firstly, it is important to understand that genuine shoes often undergo rigorous quality control measures during manufacturing. These measures ensure that the materials used are of high quality and the construction of the shoe is up to standard. However, even with these measures in place, there are instances where genuine shoes may experience glue separation due to various factors such as wear and tear, environmental conditions, or even the materials used in the shoe's construction. This does not necessarily mean that the shoe is of inferior quality; rather, it could be a result of natural wear and tear over time.

On the other hand, Putian, a region in China known for its shoe manufacturing industry, produces a wide range of footwear that caters to different markets. While some of these shoes are indeed of high quality and may not show signs of glue opening easily, there are also instances where the quality may not be as good due to the use of inferior materials or improper manufacturing techniques. Therefore, it is not accurate to assume that all shoes from Putian are not subject to glue opening or de-lamination.

Moreover, the issue of glue opening should not be the sole criterion for judging the quality of a shoe. Other factors such as comfort, durability, and material quality should also be considered. In fact, some genuine shoes are designed to have a certain degree of flexibility that may result in slight glue opening without affecting the shoe's performance or durability. Conversely, some Putian-made shoes may exhibit excellent durability but may lack in comfort or material quality. Hence, a comprehensive evaluation of a shoe's quality should take into account multiple factors beyond just glue opening.

In conclusion, it is important to perform a comprehensive assessment of a shoe's quality based on multiple factors such as material quality, construction techniques, comfort, and durability rather than solely relying on whether the shoe opens glue or not. Both genuine and Putian-made shoes have their own strengths and weaknesses depending on the specific product and its intended use. Therefore, consumers should make their purchasing decisions based on a holistic evaluation of these factors rather than relying on assumptions or misconceptions.