Bootleg sneakersPujian 1970s Shoes: Glue Peeling Problem Exposed

Bootleg sneakersPujian 1970s Shoes: Glue Peeling Problem Exposed， 

The Issue of Shoe Glue Peeling in Putian's Shoes in the 1970s

Putian, located in the heart of China’s shoe manufacturing region, has a rich history of footwear production. However, in the 1970s, a common issue that many consumers faced with shoes produced in Putian was the problem of shoe glue peeling, especially due to the use of low-quality adhesives in the shoe manufacturing process.

During this era, shoe manufacturers were often challenged with balancing quality and cost-effectiveness. While there was a focus on delivering affordable footwear options to a wider consumer base, the use of inferior materials and adhesives became prevalent. This resulted in a significant number of complaints about the quality of the shoes being mass-produced in Putian.

The Impact of Shoe Glue Peeling

The issue of shoe glue peeling caused significant inconvenience to consumers. Shoes often lost their structural integrity after a short period of use, leading to discomfort and dissatisfaction. This issue was particularly pronounced in active wear or work boots where the adhesive was subjected to more wear and tear. In some cases, the glue peeling resulted in the formation of small gaps or even complete detachment of the upper material from the sole.

This problem also impacted the reputation of Putian’s footwear industry. As complaints about poor quality grew, it became a significant concern for both local manufacturers and government authorities. It led to decreased sales and a negative perception among potential buyers about the reliability and durability of locally produced footwear.

Addressing the Issue

To address this issue, manufacturers in Putian began to reassess their production practices and started using better quality adhesives that were more resistant to wear and tear. Quality control measures were also implemented to ensure that only high-quality materials were used in the production process. Additionally, government authorities intervened by setting up strict quality standards and regulations to ensure that manufacturers complied with these standards.

Moreover, education and awareness among consumers about the importance of quality footwear was also emphasized. By providing information about how to identify good quality shoes and encouraging consumers to prioritize quality over price, Putian’s footwear industry gradually regained trust from consumers.

Conclusion